Lifchus the Supreme Court of Canada offered some guidelines for understanding the reasonable doubt standard. Talk to an Experienced Criminal Lawyer with PROVEN RESULTS. ![]() In order to rebut the presumption of innocence, the prosecution must prove their case to the extent that a reasonable person could not have any reasonable doubt as to the guilt of the defendant. The notion of reasonable doubt is inextricably intertwined with the presumption of innocence. ![]() In our criminal justice system, every defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty. The Supreme Court of Canada has offered a number of guidelines applicable to the concept of reasonable doubt. The term “reasonable doubt” has a specific meaning in criminal law. At minimum, it is sufficient for the defence to argue that the Crown has failed to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt. It is not up to the defendant or his or her criminal defence lawyer to prove the defendant’s innocence. If the Crown fails to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt, the judge/jury must acquit the defendant. ![]() This means that the Crown must prove that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. This means that the judge or jury must be satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty. The standard of proof in a Canadian criminal trial is proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |